Status quo in Osaka – Part 1: The problems
The first major seeds of anticipation for the new J League season were
sown last Friday with the announcement of the 2009 fixture lists, but as
supporters and players across the country began to look forward to their
opening matches next month, fans in Osaka were again left to rue the one game
that was missing. Cerezo Osaka’s narrow failure to secure a top-three finish
last season means that they will face a third straight year in the second
division, and the local derby with Gamba will once again be absent from the
calendar. It may not be a rivalry with the highest profile in the country, but
for those of us with a vested interest, Gamba’s 3-1 win in the last Osaka derby
in September 2006 feels like a very long time ago.
The rapid expansion of the J League immediately after its inauguration
in 1993 was, in retrospect, undoubtedly less than ideal for the baseball-mad
Kansai region in particular. Gamba had been one of the league’s ten founding
members, but they were quickly joined by Cerezo in 1995 after the former Yanmar
Diesel club had decided to leave their base in Amagasaki, near Kobe. Kyoto got
Purple Sanga (now just plain old Kyoto Sanga) in 1996, before the old heartland
of Japanese football was finally given a professional team to call its own, in
the form of Vissel Kobe, the following year. In short, Gamba had gone from
being the sole Kansai representatives during the J League’s initial boom to
having to compete with three local rivals as the sport stagnated in the late
nineties, and average attendances at Banpaku fell from their 1994 peak of
22,367 to a mere 7,996 in just five years.
In a part of the country with so much local tradition and pride, having
to share the Osaka name has also caused problems for the two clubs concerned.
As professional football was essentially being introduced as a fresh concept
within Japanese society, the J League was intelligent enough to recognise the
social importance of identity, and to implement a hometown system and a One Hundred
Year Vision to compel its clubs to cultivate links with their local
communities. However, Gamba have been forced to adopt the commuter town of
Suita, where most people are first- or second-generation residents whose
families first arrived in the 1960s or later and, as such, the extent of any
roots established is rather limited. Aware of this, Gamba have sought to
develop their advertising and social programmes to represent the wider
Hokusetsu and Kita-Kawachi areas, but these too are rather awkward flags that
few would rush to salute. Osaka is the only name that matters, and though
Cerezo have taken the city itself as their hometown, an equal number of Gamba
fans living within its limits means that no singular identity has been created
here either.
The ultimate consequences of such issues were demonstrated in supporter
surveys I conducted as part of my undergraduate research four years ago. The
sheer ambiguity of Gamba’s sphere of influence was underlined by the wide
variety of responses supporters gave as to where they considered the club’s
hometown to be. Almost 80% of those questioned felt that Gamba had failed to
establish real roots in the area, while more than half expressed
dissatisfaction at the club’s treatment of its followers. Fans of Cerezo were
not quite as angry as their counterparts at Banpaku, but the results of my
survey at Nagai were similarly negative. Most worryingly, the representatives
of Gamba whom I met to discuss my findings appeared dismissive of their
significance.
Things may have improved and the boardroom may have begun to wisen since
then, but wider interest in football in Osaka remains rather fickle. Though
Gamba have started filling their small stadium, this has had much more to do
with the team’s successes on the pitch than with the club’s efforts off it, as
evidenced by the manner in which attendances fell again as soon as results took
a turn for the worse last year. Cerezo, meanwhile, have seen supporter numbers
fall by almost half since their relegation to J2. Issues like these clearly
need to be solved if football is to develop in this part of Japan, but the best
way of doing so may, however, be to turn the situation on its head. Having two
teams in the city should in fact be a real positive.
Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://app.cocolog-nifty.com/t/trackback/222697/44035055
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Status quo in Osaka – Part 1: The problems:

Comments